|
| Pampers UnderJams Night Wear For Boys, Size S/M (38-65 Lbs), 27-Count Packages (Pack of 3) | 
 enlarge | Brand: Pampers
Category: Health And Beauty
Buy New: $51.00
New (2) from $51.00
Avg. Customer Rating:  8 reviews
Sales Rank: 4276
Size: Boys S/M, 38-65 Lbs. (81 UnderJams)
Shipping Weight (lbs): 10.4
Dimensions (in): 15.4 x 12.3 x 10.9
ASIN: B0015MVHXQ
Release Date: April 14, 2008
Promotion: Data not available Terms and Conditions
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
|
| Features:
| • | Case Pack of three 27-count packages (81 total UnderJams) | | • | UnderJams absorbent underwear for bedwetters features NightLock absorbent core | | • | Made with quiet, cloth-like materials to help give kids the privacy they want | | • | Designed like underwear, lets skin breathe | | • | Night Wear with the quality you expect from Pampers |
|
| Similar Items:
| • | Pampers Cruisers, Size 4, Economy Plus Pack, 140 Cruisers | | • | Pampers UnderJams Night Wear For Boys, Size L/XL (58-85 Lbs), 21-Count Packages (Pack of 3) | | • | Pampers Sensitive Baby Wipes Refills, Case Pack, Four - 210 Count Resealable Packages, 840 Total Wipes | | • | Pampers Baby Wipes Refills, Natural Aloe, Unscented, 770 Wipes | | • | Pampers UnderJams Night Wear For Girls, Size S/M (38-65 Lbs), 27-Count Packages (Pack of 3) |
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 3 more reviews...
 Working great for us! August 27, 2008
I bought these for my 4 1/2 year old son who still needs to wear something at night. We have used 2 packs of them already and have not had one single leaking accident. The Pull-Ups were leaking constantly and the Goodnites were very expensive and leaking occasionally too. These were lower priced so I gave them a try. The only thing I notice with these is that they tend to be a bit large and sometimes pull down on my son's waist. He is 40 lbs. and I use the s/m size.
Great! August 19, 2008
We've been using UnderJams for about 2 months on our 4-year old. We tried them just as a cheaper alternative to Good Nites (only $.70 cheaper at our grocer) but ended up liking them more. We have had NO problems with them leaking. Our son likes the design better - they don't seem like diapers, or big and bulky. They seem more like underwear to him - helping him to learn to use the potty instead of wetting. Definitely love UnderJams.
 Thought I'd finally found an affordable option to Goodnites. Nope. August 10, 2008
I've tried every single option to try to find something more affordable than Goodnights. But nothing works. I THOUGHT these were the first viable, somewhat less expensive option. But they only work about 50% of the time. We have a LOT of overflows...such that my boys (ages 6 and 7) are totally soaked...clear up to their entire shirts! The sheet changing so often just isn't worth the couple of dollars I can save with this brand. Alas...like the rest of you...I'm back to Goodnights and the extra money. Sigh.
Poor design from Pampers July 25, 2008
3 out of 3 found this review helpful
My son is a tall 5 year old who usually wears Goodnites. We had a coupon for the Underjams and we've tried them for two weeks. We have had a wreck of leaks about 50% of the time, unfortunately. I can't establish exactly why, but it seems that it's due to the fact that they are lower cut (to avoid being seen above the waistline). The low cut does not work well with an active sleeper and folds down in the front. We are certainly going back to Goodnites!
 Very much like diapers, and they leak. :( July 24, 2008
2 out of 5 found this review helpful
I was looking forward to trying these with my 7-year-old son, who still has nighttime accidents and usually uses Goodnites. I liked the idea that they were supposed to be softer, more like real underwear. Well, the second I opened the package, my 7-year-old and 3-year-old boys were running around the house calling them diapers and making fun of them. Apparently, something about these reminds them of diapers whereas Goodnites do not...? I was also very disappointed to find that they are not able to hold in my 7-year-old's accidents like Goodnites do. We NEVER have a problem with leakage in the Goodnites, but most certainly did with these. Poor kid was soaked.
|
|
|
| |
