|
| Biosoft Flushable Diaper Liners - Large 12x7.5 Inch Sheets | 
 enlarge | Brand: Bummis
Category: Health And Beauty
This item is no longer available
Avg. Customer Rating:  6 reviews
Sales Rank: 23796
Autographed: No
Memorabilia: No
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.5
Dimensions (in): 3.5 x 3.5 x 8
UPC: 843471000441
EAN: 0843471000441
ASIN: B001CAWWSK
|
| Features:
| • | They make using cloth diapers even easier! | | • | 100 sheets per roll. Each sheet is approximately 12 X 7.5 inches. | | • | Biodegradble, septic tank safe. Smaller size also available. | | • | The perfect compromise between convenience and cloth diapers. | | • | A bargin at just $6.49 per roll of 100 sheets. |
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
They make using cloth diapers even easier! Bio-soft liners are flushable diaper liners that make clean-up a breeze ?o?e?C this product is the perfect compromise between convenience and cloth diapers. No more rinsing poopy diapers in the toilet! Bio-soft liners absorb the solid waste - and then you simply discard the soiled liner in the toilet and flush away the mess. They are non-irritating and ever so soft and comfortable against baby's sensitive skin. Bio-soft liners are made of a non woven material with no binder, and will biodegrade very quickly (within 8 days in a sewage treatment system or 20 days in a septic tank). They are 100% viscose rayon, a cellulosic fiber derived from natural sources, and are made to Bummis' specifications in England. Includes 100 sheets per roll that each measure 7.5 x 12 inches Return Note: For hygienic reasons, this product can not be returned.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 1 more reviews...
 ok, but not the best August 17, 2008
0 out of 1 found this review helpful
These work fine in cloth diapers to help make the cleaing up of poop easier. They are not washable or reusable though so I prefer Kushies. With Kushies I could reuse the ones that just had pee on them for several washings making a pack of 100 go much further.
Way better than old school! July 1, 2008
These are great for cloth diapering without having to put your hands in the toilet for poopies. The only problem I have had is that they occasionally get bunched up, so there is a little overflow onto the diaper. Overall I am very happy with this product.
 Works for us. April 29, 2008
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
These work very well for us, they are softer than another brand that I tried and more flexible. It makes cloth diapering much easier.
Works great! April 5, 2008
3 out of 3 found this review helpful
While these are thin, they definitely are *not* the same as using tissue. They are long enough that you can fold them if you need more thickness. Tissue will disintegrate when wet, so please do not heed the previous reviewer's advice and use tissue instead. ;)
We haven't had a problem with them being too narrow, but your mileage may vary here.
Overall, I've been very pleased with them. They are much softer than the Gerber brand of liners (and being flushable is a huge plus). We've not had any issues with flushing them either (we have a septic system and an older toilet), and they work fine for what we need.
The only thing I would caution is that if you're needing them to protect a cloth diaper from an oil-based cream, you might want to fold it or use two liners, since they are so thin. But this product comes in two rolls, so there are lots of sheets included.
Not what I expected March 26, 2008
1 out of 2 found this review helpful
I thought these were like think plush liners, but it turns out they are just really big tissues. You could probably do the same thing with a tissue. They work for what their purpose is - to collect the solid waste in the diapers, but I don't think that I will be buying them again. I will just be saving a little money and buy tissues from the grocery store instead. And I was a little shocked at how they came to me. They were in a plastic shipping bag (like the ones that you get from the post office) and they had no labels on them or wrapping. Just the roll in the bag. Very strange.
|
|
|
| |
